Elevating façade performance: one certified practitioner at a time

1 why cert matters
A blog on usglassmag.com by Helen Sanders
capacity small
Building market capacity to ensure there are sufficient qualified professionals who understand façade materials and assemblies and can design, detail, inspect, test and commission façades is critical for market transformation to higher-performing buildings. Credit: AI.

For the past few months, I have been reviewing the blueprint for change that the Façade Tectonics Institute (FTI) developed to address the many barriers to the adoption of high-performance facades. This month, I am focusing on the fifth concept for change, which was created to address two identified obstacles to the adoption of high-performance facades, related to practitioner capacity:

  • Insufficient number of qualified façade consultants and engineers
  • Often, inadequate building energy simulations, especially related to the façade

These gaps in façade-related expertise and simulation undermine the design, execution and commissioning of high-performance façades. To address these issues, FTI proposes:

  • A broad certification program for façade professionals
  • A standardized process for simulating facades in support of code compliance

Why Certification Matters

I have previously written about the importance of certification for people and products, quoting David Stutzman, founder of Conspectus, who asserted in his 2018 GlassCon Global paper that certification provides “a uniform measure of an accepted standard to demonstrate qualifications and the ability to reduce risk.”

why cert matters
Why certification matters. Credit: Technoform

In addition to stakeholder risk reduction, for façade professionals, certification can offer a standardized pathway to verify competence, build the industry’s capacity and elevate the quality and consistency of façade design and execution. In addition, certification can:

  • Build trust among stakeholders
  • Ensure code compliance and incentive eligibility
  • Drive market transformation through professional accountability
  • Reduce the cost to deliver high performance

We have seen the beauty of professional certification demonstrated by the two certification programs run by the Architectural Glass and Metal Certification Council (AGMCC):

The adoption of these certification programs has gained traction in the installer community. They provide risk mitigation to glazing contractors, owners, insurers and general contractors and have set the quality bar for glazing system installation.

figure 2

A North American Certified Façade Engineer Program

A certified façade engineer program is envisaged as a comprehensive educational and certification framework to equip professionals with the skills needed to design, simulate and supervise the construction of, and commission, high-performance facades.

Key Components of the Proposed Program

The concept is a module-based curriculum aligned with topics such as:

  • Understanding assemblies and materials
  • Design and detailing
  • Building energy simulation related to the building envelope and façade assembly thermal modeling
  • Field inspection, testing and commissioning

With several tracks, professionals would be able to achieve certification aligned with specific specialties, such as field testing, commissioning and energy simulation and thermal modeling, or across the full breadth of the curriculum. The modular approach would allow façade professionals to specialize. Importantly, it would enable professionals to focus on whole-building performance, such as whole-building commissioning or energy modeling, to ensure they have sufficient expertise in façade performance to execute their responsibilities at the building level fully.

Benchmarking Existing Models

There are already models for certification programs from other fields and internationally that can be benchmarked and leveraged. Several certification programs and training resources exist at the building level:

These should be reviewed to identify any gaps related to the façade. Then, we can determine how best to close the gaps and connect them to the façade engineer certification program.

Standardizing Façade Simulation

Standardized simulation procedures for building envelopes are essential to ensure the consistency and accuracy of building energy modeling. In the absence of clear guidelines, façade simulations vary widely in quality, undermining performance predictions and code compliance.

Vancouver, British Columbia, has taken the lead on setting standards for building energy modeling. They produced a set of guidelines designed to standardize simulations and ensure code compliance, which the province subsequently adopted. Their guidelines focus on façade simulation, including spandrel simulation, the performance of which is often overestimated. A North American standard would support improved simulation standards, code compliance and implementing a professional certification program.

Maximizing the Impact

The impact of façade professional certifications and standardized façade simulation can be maximized by embedding requirements for accreditation and standardized simulation into the regulatory and project delivery ecosystem, including:

  • Code integration: Requiring certified professionals to carry out simulations following a code-mandated standardized method, and to complete façade design and detailing, inspection and commissioning, would ensure at least code-minimum performance in both design and as-built.
  • Architectural specifications: Mandating certified façade engineers to supervise design, simulation, installation and commissioning would improve quality assurance and reduce owners’ risk.
  • Incentive programs: Aligning local jurisdictions’ financial incentives with façade professional certification would support local capacity building of qualified professionals.

These mechanisms create a positive feedback loop in which certification drives quality and quality drives market demand.

Certification programs offer a scalable, sustainable solution to this challenge. By creating pathways for education, verification and integration, we can:

  • Increase the number of well-qualified façade professionals
  • Increase the quality of design and detailing of façade assemblies
  • Improve the consistency, comparability and reliability of façade simulations
  • Enhance construction quality control and as-built performance outcomes
  • Support code compliance and performance-based design

This certification and standardization concept is not a quick fix. From our industry experience, we know developing and implementing certification programs takes time and investment. What FTI is proposing is a long-term vision, and it will require collaboration and investment across industry, nonprofit organizations and government: An investment in the future of sustainable buildings and the professional development of the next generation of façade professionals.

Let’s build the framework for façade excellence–one certified professional at a time.